| Titre : | Teaching and learning modalities for continuing professional development in the long-term care: A rapid synthesis review (2023) |
| Auteurs : | Nicola Pagnucci ; Giuseppe Aleo ; Witold Orlik ; Paul Mahon ; Thomas Kearns ; Carmel Kelly ; Thomas Lordan ; Catherine Fitzgerald |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | Nurse Education in Practice (Vol. 70, July 2023) |
| Article en page(s) : | 103638 |
| Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103638 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Développement professionnel ; Evaluation ; Formation continue ; Méthode d'apprentissage ; Soins de longue durée |
| Mots-clés: | Stratégie pédagogique |
| Résumé : | Aim To describe the various teaching and learning modalities for the delivery of Continuing Professional Development activities for health care professionals in the long-term care sector. Background Continuing Professional Development is a key activity that organisations undertake to achieve effective workforce planning, recruitment, retention and upskilling strategies in long-term care settings. During the Covid-19 pandemic there was a rapid move to online modalities of Continuous Professional Development, but there is a paucity of evidence in relation to their effectiveness compared with face-to-face, or in-class learning. Design A rapid synthesis review. Methods MEDLINE, CINAHL and HEALTH BUSINESS ELITE databases were used to identify relevant articles that were published between 2016 and 2022. Original studies of any design investigating Continuing Professional Development activities, with or without a comparison between interventions or activities were included. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was followed. The Kirkpatrick model was adopted as a globally recognised method for evaluating training programmes. Results After a full text analysis, 34 papers were included in the review. Face to face was the most common method of delivery followed by online, while blended (a mix of face-to-face and online delivery) was the least common method used. The teaching modalities were not associated with specific learning contents, but were used for a range of content. Most studies obtained positive outcomes following implementation of the educational interventions. Kirkpatrick Level 4 (results) was the most commonly measured outcome. Conclusions While blended learning was the least common method of delivery, it was found to be more beneficial for learners than face-to-face or online exclusively. There are now new spaces to learn and new technologies that allow us to ?reimagine? where, when and how we teach. This requires Continuing Professional Development providers to design and tailor their courses according to health professionals? learning needs and the clinical contexts where they work. We recommend that Continuing Professional Development providers involve employers when designing teaching and learning activities for Long Term Care workers, to decide which modalities enable effective knowledge translation. |
| Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
| En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595323001002 |
Bibliothèques HE Vinci
