Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Reproducibility, Construct Validity, and Responsiveness of the Tetraplegia Upper Limb Activities Questionnaire, TUAQ. Part 2 (2022) |
Auteurs : | Johanna Wangdell ; Bridget Hill ; Jennifer A. Dunn |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Vol. 103, n° 12, 2022) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 2296-2302 |
Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2022.05.001 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Membre supérieur ; Mesures des résultats rapportés par les patients (PROM) ; Psychométrie ; Réadaptation ; Tétraplégie |
Résumé : |
Objective
To test reliability, construct validity and responsiveness of the Tetraplegia Upper Limb Activities Questionnaire (TUAQ), a patient-reported outcome measure that assesses perceived performance and satisfaction with 10 standardized activities. Design Outcome measure psychometric evaluation. Setting Spinal cord injury units in 2 countries. Participants Reproducibility: 47 individuals with tetraplegia. Construct validity and responsiveness: 33 individuals with tetraplegia undergoing surgery to restore hand function (N=80). Interventions Reproducibility: The TUAQ was completed on 2 occasions, 2 weeks apart. Construct validity and responsiveness: Participants completed the TUAQ prior to surgery and 3-12 months after hand reconstruction surgery. Internal consistency was examined using Cronbach α. Two agreement parameters were examined: the SEM and minimal detectable change with 90% confidence interval (MDC90). Construct validity was evaluated using Pearson product moment correlation against a priori hypotheses. Responsiveness was assessed using paired t tests and effect size. Results Test-retest reliability and internal consistency was high (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.89 for performance scale and 0.88 for satisfaction, Cronbach α of 0.92 and 0.90, respectively). For agreement the SEM scores were 4.7 and 3.5, with MDC90 of 10.9 and 8.2, respectively. Responsiveness and construct validity showed sound results with no ceiling or floor effects and with large effect size (>1.05). Conclusions The TUAQ demonstrates good psychometric properties for reliability and agreement for persons with tetraplegia and responsiveness and construct validity for surgical reconstruction of hand function for persons with tetraplegia. The TUAQ appears appropriate to be used as a patient-reported outcome measure for clinical and research purposes in this population. |
Note de contenu : | Under a Creative Commons license |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999322003999 |