| Titre : | Virtual reality and motor control exercises to treat chronic neck pain: A randomized controlled trial (2022) |
| Auteurs : | Hatice Cetin ; Nezire Kose ; Halil Kamil Oge |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | Musculoskeletal Science and Practice (Vol. 62, December 2022) |
| Article en page(s) : | 102636 |
| Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102636 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Anxiété ; Cervicalgie ; Exercice physique ; Proprioception ; Qualité de vie |
| Résumé : | Aim To compare the effects of virtual reality (VR) and motor control (MC) exercises. Methods Forty-one participants with chronic neck pain (CNP) were randomized into the VR or MC group. Both groups performed 18 sessions over 6 weeks. The primary outcomes were pain intensity (visual analogue scale), pain pressure thresholds (PPTs), joint position sense error (JPSE), and muscle performance. The secondary outcomes were the Profile Fitness Mapping Questionnaire (ProFitMap-Neck), Hospital Anxiety-Depression Scale (HADS), and quality of life (SF-36). Data were analysed using T-Tests, and Fisher's Exact Test. Mean (standard deviation), median (interquartile range), effect size and %95 confidence interval (CI) were reported. Results The results of Independent T-Tests showed that VR was advantageous in terms of PPTs of the C1/C2 and C5/C6 articular pillar bilaterally and large effect size (Cohen's d > 0.8, p 0.08; mean difference changes between ?2.91 and ?1.24, %95 CI -4.47 to 0.80) and functional limitation (ProFitMap-Neck) (Cohen's d = 0.7, mean difference 8.27, %95 CI 0.20 to 16.35). The results of T-Tests demonstrated that neither intervention was superior in terms of pain intensity, muscle performance, symptoms (ProFitMap-Neck), HADS, or SF-36 (Cohen's d |
| Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
| En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781222001369 |
Bibliothèques HE Vinci
