| Titre : | Are people good prognosticators of their own pain? An exploration of the relationship between sex-specific pain beliefs and clinical pain evaluation (2022) |
| Auteurs : | Lauren N. Straatman ; Michael J. Lukacs ; Joshua Y. Lee ; Maryam Ghodrati ; Emily A. Lalone ; David M. Walton |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | Musculoskeletal Science and Practice (Vol. 62, December 2022) |
| Article en page(s) : | 102667 |
| Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102667 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Auto-évaluation diagnostique ; Mesure de la douleur |
| Mots-clés: | Croyances spécifiques au sexe en matière de douleur ; Capacité prédictive |
| Résumé : | Background Under-explored to date are the interacting influences of patient sex on multi-modal evaluation techniques that tap different domains of the pain experience. Objectives The primary aim of Study 1 was to explore the accuracy of sex-specific personal pain beliefs in relation to quantitative pain indicators within sexes, and the secondary objective was to compare the accuracy of sex-specific personal pain beliefs in relation to quantitative pain indicators between sexes. The primary objective of Study 2 was to explore the accuracy of sex-specific personal pain beliefs and self-rated pain severity within sexes, and the secondary objective was to compare sex-specific personal pain beliefs and pain severity ratings between sexes. Methods A cross-sectional analysis on two datasets was performed (Study 1, n = 50; Study 2, n = 111). For both studies, independent samples t-tests were used to identify differences in clinical pain evaluations based on sex-specific pain beliefs. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare the predictive accuracy of males and females clinical pain evaluations based on their ability to handle pain. Results There were no statistically significant differences in clinical pain evaluations based on self-rated pain beliefs in either study. In Study 2, males were descriptively more accurate predictors of their clinical pain evaluations than were females, though none of the between sex comparisons were statistically significant. Conclusion This work highlights the importance of considering all available clinical pain evaluations as one technique is unlikely to represent the patients pain experience. |
| Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
| En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781222001679 |
Bibliothèques HE Vinci
