Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Mediating Effects of Pain Interference on the Relationships Between Pain Intensity and Probable Major Depression Among Participants With Spinal Cord Injury (2022) |
Auteurs : | Chao Li ; Nicole D. DiPiro ; Jillian M.R. Clark ; James S. Krause |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Vol. 103, n° 4, 2022) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 747-754 |
Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.04.011 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Dépression ; Douleur ; Réadaptation ; Traumatismes de la moelle épinière ; Trouble dépressif majeur |
Résumé : |
Objective
To evaluate whether pain interference mediates the relationship between pain intensity and probable major depression (PMD) among persons with spinal cord injury (SCI), accounting for differences in the frequency of prescription medication use and resilience. Design Cross-sectional analysis using self-report assessment. Setting Medical university in the Southeastern United States. Participants There were a total of 4670 participants (N=4670), all of whom had traumatic SCI of at least 1-year duration, identified from the Southeastern Regional SCI Model System and 2 state-based surveillance systems. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 was used to define PMD. Covariates included demographic and injury characteristics, pain severity, pain interference, and resilience. Separate sets of multistage logistic regression analyses were conducted for 3 levels of prescription pain medication use (daily, occasional/weekly, none). Results Pain intensity was related to a greater risk of PMD (odds ratio [OR]daily pain medication user, 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-1.35; ORoccasional/weekly pain medication user, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.16-1.36; ORnonpain medication user, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.33-1.56), but this relationship disappeared after consideration of pain interference (ORdaily pain medication user, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90-1.04; ORoccasional/weekly pain medication user, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.84-1.05; ORnonpain medication user, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.95-1.20), which indicates pain interference was a mediator between pain intensity and PMD and there was no direct relationship between pain intensity and PMD. Resilience was protective of PMD in each model but was not a mediator. Conclusions Although pain intensity was associated with PMD, the relationship was mediated by pain interference. Resilience was an important protective factor. Therefore, clinicians should assess pain interference when screening for PMD and direct treatment at reducing pain interference. Building resilience may further reduce the risk of PMD. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999321003701#! |