Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Electrolipolysis associated with aerobic activity does not reduce subcutaneous adipose tissue of the abdominal region of young women : a randomized clinical trial (2022) |
Auteurs : | Jessica Amelia do Nascimento ; Larissa Danielly Araújo Martins ; Michelle Martins Duarte ; Francilene Lira Matias ; Silvana Cristina de Araújo Pereira Venceslau ; Heleodório Honorato dos Santos ; José Jamacy de Almeida Ferreira ; Palloma Rodrigues de Andrade |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies (Vol. 29, January 2022) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 106-111 |
Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.10.014 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Électrolyse ; Exercice physique ; Stimulation électrique ; Thérapeutique ; Tissu adipeux |
Résumé : |
Objective To analyze the effects of electrolysis, through a medium frequency current, associated to aerobic physical activity in the body composition of young women.
Methods The study was composed of 34 sedentary women (24.35 ± 4.43 years, 71.30 ± 7.08 kg, 1.61 ± 0.06 m, 27.31 ± 1.67 kg/m2) which were evaluated for their anthropometric measures and body composition. The volunteers were randomly assigned to two group: Electrolyphysis plus Aerobic Exercise (gEEA): 17 volunteers were submitted to the application, for 60 min , of the Aussie current, followed by aerobic physical activity (77% of HRmax) on the trampoline for 40 min, through video-lessons of Jump; and Aerobic Exercise group (gEA): 17 volunteers performed only physical activity following the same parameters mentioned above. Each group performed its protocols twice weekly, for 5 weeks, totaling 10 sessions. For the data analysis, measures repeated ANOVA was performed to compare the means of the variables analyzed before and after the treatment protocols using the SPSS - 21.0 software, adopting a p ≤ 0.05. Results Although gEEA decreased suprailiac skinfold (p = 0.04), abdominal skinfold (p = 0.03) and circumference at umbilical scar (p = 0.02) in an intragroup analysis, these means differences in anthropometric measures were not important between-groups (p > 0.05). Furthermore, there were no effect of treatment on body composition (p > 0.05). Conclusion To this studied condition, our results suggested that application of medium frequency electrolysis did not enhance the losses on anthropometric measures and body composition. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859221002552 |