| Titre : | The relationship between feedback and evaluative judgement in undergraduate nursing and midwifery education: An integrative review (2022) |
| Auteurs : | Chanika Ilangakoon ; Rola Ajjawi ; Ruth Endacott ; Charlotte E. Rees |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | Nurse Education in Practice (Vol. 58, January 2022) |
| Article en page(s) : | 9 p. |
| Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103255 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Élève infirmier ; Enseignement supérieur ; Rétroaction ; Sage-femme ; Soins infirmiers |
| Résumé : | Aim This integrative review aims to explore the relationship between feedback and evaluative judgement in undergraduate nursing and midwifery education. Background Research in higher education has shown that feedback practices can lead to students? developing evaluative judgement; thought critical for performance improvement and life-long learning. While literature in nursing and midwifery education has not yet employed the term ?evaluative judgement? explicitly, there might be similar concepts and practices that seek to develop students? judgement of performance that sustain learning beyond the immediate task. Design An integrative review of the nursing and midwifery feedback literature. Methods In February 2020, six online databases (CINAHL, ProQuest, Scopus, ERIC, PsycINFO, Ovid MEDLINE) were systematically searched for literature published between January 1989-February 2020. Synonyms for feedback and evaluative judgement were used to inform our search. This review included a rigorous team-based, five-stage approach: (1) identifying the problem; (2) conducting the search; (3) evaluating the data; (4) analysing the data; and (5) presenting the integrative review. Results A total of 1408 studies were initially retrieved with 543 duplicates. 865 abstracts were screened using eligibility criteria, resulting in the exclusion of 835 studies. Thirty full-text studies were appraised for quality. Eighteen studies with diverse methodologies achieved a medium-high quality score for inclusion in data analysis. Conceptions of feedback and evaluative judgement were identified in all studies; despite none using the term 'evaluative judgement' explicitly. Thematic analysis of the studies resulted in seven themes: conceptions of feedback, purposes of feedback, sources of feedback, modes of feedback, conceptions of evaluative judgement, purposes of evaluative judgement and relationships between feedback and evaluative judgement. Conclusions While our findings supported contemporary higher education research, the feedback-evaluative judgement relationship is novel in nursing education. We encourage educators to design feedback activities privileging students? active engagement through dialogic feedback, reflection and self-assessment, to develop their evaluative judgement of practice. |
| Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
| En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595321002912 |
Bibliothèques HE Vinci
