Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Applying a Bookmarking Approach to Setting Clinically Relevant Interpretive Standards for the Spinal Cord InjuryFunctional Index/Capacity Basic Mobility and Self-Care Item Bank Scores (2022) |
Auteurs : | Pamela A. Kisala ; David Victorson ; Ratna Nandakumar ; Andrew Shermeyer ; Denise C. Fyffe ; Allen W. Heinemann ; Trevor A. Dyson-Hudson ; David S. Tulsky |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Vol. 103, n° 2, 2022) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 224-236 |
Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.08.026 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Activités de la vie quotidienne ; Mesures des résultats rapportés par les patients (PROM) ; Mobilité réduite ; Réadaptation ; Traumatismes de la moelle épinière |
Résumé : |
Objectives
To develop clinically relevant interpretive standards for the Spinal Cord InjuryFunctional Index/Capacity (SCI-FI/C) Basic Mobility and Self-Care item bank scores. Design Modified bookmarking standard-setting methodology, including 2 stakeholder consensus meetings with individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) and SCI clinicians, respectively, and a final, combined (consumers and clinicians) convergence meeting. Setting Two SCI Model System centers in the United States. Participants Fourteen adults who work with individuals with traumatic SCI and 14 clinicians who work with individuals with SCI. Main Outcome Measures Placement of bookmarks between vignettes based on SCI-FI Basic Mobility and Self-Care T scores. Bookmarks were placed between vignettes representing No Problems, Mild Problems, Moderate Problems, and Severe Problems for each item bank. Results Each consensus group resulted in a single set of scoring cut points for the SCI-FI/C Basic Mobility and Self-Care item banks. The cut points were similar but not identical between the consumer and clinician groups, necessitating a final convergence meeting. For SCI-FI/C Basic Mobility, the convergence group agreed on cut scores of 61.25 (no problems/mild problems), 51.25 (mild problems/moderate problems), and 41.25 (moderate problems/severe problems). For SCI-FI/C Self-Care, the convergence group agreed on cut scores of 56.25 (no/mild), 51.25 (mild/moderate), and 38.75 (moderate/severe). Conclusions The results of this study provide straightforward interpretive guidelines for SCI researchers and clinicians using the SCI-FI/C Basic Mobility and Self-Care instruments. These results are appropriate for the full bank, computer adaptive test, and short-form versions of the SCI-FI/C Basic Mobility and Self-Care item banks. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000399932031251X#! |