| Titre : | Incentives for Uptake of and Adherence to Outpatient Stroke Rehabilitation Services: A 3-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial (2022) |
| Auteurs : | David Bruce Matchar ; Sherry Hsueh Yi Young ; Rita Sim ; Christine Jia Ying Yu ; Xiaoxi Yan ; Deidre Anne De Silva ; Bibhas Chakraborty |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Vol. 103, n° 1, 2022) |
| Article en page(s) : | p. 1-7.e4 |
| Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.08.013 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Accident vasculaire cérébral (AVC) ; Motivation ; Observance par le patient ; Patients en consultation externe ; Réadaptation ; Transports |
| Résumé : |
Objective
To determine if rehabilitation uptake and adherence can be increased by providing coordinated transportation (increased convenience) and eliminating out-of-pocket costs (reduced expense). Design Three-arm randomized controlled trial. Setting Stroke units of 2 Singapore tertiary hospitals. Participants Singaporeans or permanent residents 21 years or older who were diagnosed as having stroke and were discharged home with physician's recommendation to continue outpatient rehabilitation (N=266). Interventions A Transportation Incentives arm (T), which provides free transportation services, a Transportation & Sessions Incentives arm (T&S), offering free transportation and prescribed stroke rehabilitation sessions, and a control arm, Education (E), consisting of a stroke rehabilitation educational program. Main Outcome Measures The primary study outcome was uptake of outpatient rehabilitation services (ORS) among patients poststroke and key predefined secondary outcomes being number of sessions attended and adherence to prescribed sessions. Results Uptake rate of ORS was 73.0% for E (confidence interval [CI], 63.8%-82.3%), 81.8% for T (CI, 73.8%-89.8%), and 84.3% for T&S (CI, 76.7%-91.8%). Differences of T and T&S vs E were not statistically significant (P=.22 and P=.10, respectively). However, average number of rehabilitation sessions attended were significantly higher in both intervention arms: 5.50±7.65 for T and 7.51±9.52 for T&S vs 3.26±4.22 for control arm (E) (T vs E: P=.017; T&S vs E: P<.001 kaplan-meier analysis indicated that persistence was higher for t compared with e> Conclusions This study has demonstrated a possibility in increasing the uptake of and persistence to stroke ORS with free transportation and sessions. Incentivizing survivors of stroke to take up ORS is a new strategy worthy of further exploration for future policy change in financing ORS or other long-term care services. |
| Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
| En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999321014222#! |
Bibliothèques HE Vinci
