Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Are manual therapy or booster sessions worthwhile in addition to exercise therapy for knee osteoarthritis : Economic evaluation and 2-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial (2021) |
Auteurs : | Yana Pryymachenko ; Ross Wilson ; Saurab Sharma ; Anupa Pathak ; J. Haxby Abbott |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Musculoskeletal Science and Practice (Vol. 56, December 2021) |
Article en page(s) : | 102439 |
Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102439 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Analyse coût-bénéfice ; Arthrose ; Articulation du genou ; Exercice physique ; Kinésithérapie (spécialité) ; Traitement par les exercices physiques |
Résumé : | Background Exercise therapy is known to be an effective intervention for patients with osteoarthritis, however the evidence is limited as to whether adding manual therapy or booster sessions are cost-effective strategies to extend the duration of benefits. Objective To investigate the cost-effectiveness, at 2-year follow-up, of adding manual therapy and/or booster sessions to exercise therapy. Design 2-by-2 factorial randomized controlled trial. Methods Participants with knee osteoarthritis were randomly allocated (1:1:1:1) to: exercise therapy delivered in consecutive sessions within 9 weeks (control group), exercise therapy distributed over 1 year using booster sessions, exercise therapy plus manual therapy delivered within 9 weeks, and exercise therapy plus manual therapy with booster sessions. The primary outcome was incremental cost-effectiveness from health system and societal perspectives interpreted as incremental net monetary benefit (INMB). Results Of 75 participants, 66 (88 %) were retained at 1-year and 40 (53 %) at 2-year follow-up. All three interventions were cost-effective from both the health system and societal perspectives (INMBs, at 0.5 × GDP/capita willingness to pay (WTP) threshold: $3278 (95%CI -3244 to 9800) and $3904 (95%CI -2823 to 10,632) respectively for booster sessions; $2941 (95%CI -3686 to 9568) and $2618 (95%CI -4005 to 9241) for manual therapy; $270 (95%CI -6139 to 6679) and $404 (95%CI -6097 to 6905) for manual therapy with booster sessions). Conclusion Manual therapy or booster sessions in addition to exercise therapy are cost-effective at 2-year follow-up. The evidence did not support combining both booster sessions and manual therapy in addition to exercise therapy. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781221001235 |