| Titre : | Effectiveness of the Mat Pilates on the postural control, plantar pressure and plantar arch of school children : a randomized clinical trial (2021) |
| Auteurs : | Jessica Caroliny de Jesus Neves ; Jessica Caroliny de Jesus Neves ; Paola Janeiro Valenciano ; Fabiola Unbehaun Cibinello ; Mônica Yosino Leão Carvalho ; Dirce Shizuko Fujisawa |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies (Vol. 28, October 2021) |
| Article en page(s) : | p. 576-584 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Enfant (6-12 ans) ; Équilibre postural ; Essais cliniques comme sujet ; Méthodes Pilates ; Pied |
| Mots-clés: | Child ; Foot ; Pilates-based exercises ; Postural balance |
| Résumé : | Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of Mat Pilates on postural control, plantar pressure and plantar arch (ALM) in schoolchildren. Design and setting The study was a randomized clinical trial, developed at the Early Childhood Education Institute, Londrina-PR. The participants were randomly assigned to groups: Pilates Group (PG) and Control Group (CG). Patients in the CG did not perform extra physical activity (Interventions). Participants 43 children (eight to 12 years), no prior knowledge of the Pilates method, and no exercise training in the last six months. Intervention The exercise program was based on the Mat Pilates method, twice weekly, 50 min each, 28 sessions. Outcome measures Static balance (force platform), dynamic balance (the Reach Test), ALM (plantigraphy) and plantar pressure (baropodometry). The assessors were blinded to the allocation of participants. Results Three children were excluded before randomization and 40 were randomized (PG n: 20; CG n:20).12 children were excluded during the protocol (PG n:7; CG n:5) and included in the intention to treat analysis. No significant difference between groups was observed for static and dynamic balance and ALM measures. There was a significant difference in the following outcomes for the PG: the plantar pressure on the right hemibody forefoot between pre-test 38.70 + 14.38 and post-test 42.65 + 15.63 (ES = 0.66; SRM = 0.50). The plantar pressure on the right hemibody rearfoot between pre-test 61.10 + 14.18 and post-test 56.85 + 19.39 (ES = 0.68; SRM = 0.53). No adverse or harmful events were reported in any group. Conclusion There were no differences in static and dynamic postural control and ALM between PG and CG. However, children GP showed improvement in some results of plantar pressure in relation CG. Clinical trial registration number Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (REBEC) (N_ RBR-8t5p7d). |
| Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
| En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859221002072 |
Bibliothèques HE Vinci
