| Titre : | Clinical Benefits and System Design of FES-Rowing Exercise for Rehabilitation of Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review (2021) |
| Auteurs : | Gongkai Ye ; Emerson Paul Grabke ; Maureen Pakosh ; Julio C. Furlan ; Kei Masani |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Vol. 102, n° 8, 2021) |
| Article en page(s) : | p. 1595-1605 |
| Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.01.075 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Electrotherapie ; Réadaptation ; Traitement par les exercices physiques ; Traumatismes de la moelle épinière |
| Résumé : |
Objective
To comprehensively and critically appraise the clinical benefits and engineering designs of functional electrical stimulation (FES)-rowing for management of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Data Sources Electronic database searches were conducted in Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Excerpta Medica database, Emcare, Medline, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception to May 12, 2020. Study Selection Search terms used were synonyms of “spinal cord injury” for Population and “Electric Stimulation (Therapy)/ and rowing” for Intervention. Two reviewers independently assessed articles based on the following inclusion criteria: recruited individuals with SCI; had aerobic FES-rowing exercise as study intervention; reported cardiovascular, muscular, bone mineral density, or metabolic outcomes; and examined engineering design of FES-rowing systems. Of the 256 titles that were retrieved in the primary search, 24 were included in this study. Data Extraction Study characteristics, quality, participants’ characteristics, test descriptions, and results were independently extracted by 2 reviewers. The quality of studies was assessed with the Downs and Black checklist. Data Synthesis Comparison of peak oxygen consumption (V̇o2peak) rates showed that V̇o2peak during FES-rowing was significantly higher than arm-only exercise; FES-rowing training improved V̇o2peak by 11.2% on average (95% confidence interval, 7.25-15.1), with a 4.1% (95% confidence interval, 2.23-5.97) increase in V̇o2peak per month of training. FES-rowing training reduced bone density loss with increased time postinjury. The rowing ergometer used in 2 studies provided motor assistance during rowing. Studies preferred manual stimulation control (n=20) over automatic (n=4). Conclusions Our results suggest FES-rowing is a viable exercise for individuals with SCI that can improve cardiovascular performance and reduce bone density loss. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to better understand the optimal set-up for FES-rowing that maximizes the rehabilitation outcomes. |
| Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
| En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000399932100143X#! |
Bibliothèques HE Vinci
