Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Does chaining always work towards compliance gaining ? The case of the but you are free technique and social proof applied to charitable donation (2021) |
Titre original: | Le « chaining » favorise-t-il toujours la soumission ? Le cas de la technique « vous êtes libre de » et de la preuve sociale appliqué au don caritatif |
Auteurs : | Alexandre Pascual ; T. Salanova ; Ikram Bouhassine ; Cédric Denis-Rémis ; Daniel Priolo ; Fabien Girandola ; Nicolas Guéguen |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | European Review of Applied Psychology (Vol. 71, n° 3, May 2021) |
Article en page(s) : | 9 p. |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Influence sociale ; Méta-analyse ; Normes socialesAutres descripteurs Soumission |
Mots-clés: | Évocation de la liberté ; Normes descriptives |
Résumé : |
Introduction
The chaining procedure consists in linking together two or more compliance gaining strategies in order to obtain greater behavioral compliance. Objective In two studies we tested chaining that included two compliance gaining procedures: the but you are free technique (BYAF) and social proof (SP). Method A total of 2204 passersby were approached in different countries (France, Tunisia, China and Moldavia). They were asked to donate money for cancer research with, respectively, a control formulation, a BYAF formulation, a SP formulation or a BYAF + SP formulation. Results Observations indicate that chaining did not work because the BYAF + SP condition produced the same behavioral compliance as BYAF or SP separately (studies 1 and 2). Furthermore, we analyzed the participants justifications after complying with or rejecting the request and the reasons were substantially the same under each condition (study 2). Conclusion Failure to observe the chaining process is interpreted through theoretical explanations whereby BYAF and SP are antagonistic. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1162908821000323 |