| Titre : | Comparative efficacy of vitamin supplements on prevention of major cardiovascular disease: Systematic review with network meta-analysis (2020) |
| Auteurs : | Ji Han ; Chunyang Zhao ; Jiayi Cai ; Yu Liang |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice (Vol. 39, May 2020) |
| Article en page(s) : | 8p. |
| Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2020.101142 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Arrêt cardiaque ; Infarctus du myocarde ; Maladies cardiovasculaires ; Méta-analyse ; Recherche comparative sur l'efficacité ; Vitamines |
| Résumé : |
Background
Vitamins are commonly used in the prevention of major cardiovascular disease. However, the efficacy and optimum choice remain controversial. Objective To compare and rank the relative efficacy among all available vitamin preparations for cardiovascular disease through a network meta-analysis. Methods Eligible studies were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane library and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials. A random effects model was applied within a frequentist framework. Results Forty-two articles (45 comparisons, 384,248 participants), including nine vitamin interventions, were identified. Vitamin D had the highest probability of being ranked best in effectiveness (0.84 [0.72, 0.98]) on prevention of cardiovascular events. With regard to reducing death of cardiovascular disease rate, vitamin E was considered better efficacy. Conclusions Vitamin B, D and E could reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events to varying degrees. At the same time, the combination of vitamins can not show improvement on the efficacy. |
| Disponible en ligne : | Non |
Exemplaires (1)
| Cote | Support | Localisation | Section | Disponibilité |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Périodique papier | Woluwe | Espace revues | Consultation sur place uniquement Exclu du prêt |
