| Titre : | Clinical implications of Landing Error Scoring System calculation methods (2020) |
| Auteurs : | I. Hanzlíková ; Josie Athens ; Kim Hébert-Losier ; et al. |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | Physical therapy in sport (Vol. 44, July 2020) |
| Article en page(s) : | p. 61-66 |
| Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.04.035 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Biomécanique ; Blessure ; Facteurs de risque ; Mouvement du corps |
| Mots-clés: | Atterrissage ; Implication clinique ; Méthode de calcul |
| Résumé : |
Objectives
To explore whether final Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) scores differ between calculation methods used in literature. Design Cross-sectional. Setting Laboratory. Participants 328 individuals. Main outcome measures LESS scores from 984 drop-jumps were extracted. Final LESS scores were calculated for every participant according to five methods: mean of 3 jumps, 1st jump score, 3rd jump score, best jump score, and sum of errors present in at least 2 jumps. The influence of the calculation method on group mean LESS score and group-level risk categorization using threshold of 5 errors was estimated using Generalized Estimating Equations, with the mean of 3 jumps score set as the reference method. The agreement in individual-level risk categorization was assessed using odds ratios and McNemar’s tests. Results Compared to the reference, estimated group mean LESS score was 0.92 errors lower (p Conclusions Calculation method meaningfully influences final LESS scores and risk categorization. |
| Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
| En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1466853X20300298#! |
Bibliothèques HE Vinci
