| Titre : | A phenomenological study exploring midwives’ experiences of completing and implementing into practice the Perineal Assessment and Repair Longitudinal Study (PEARLS) training package (2020) |
| Auteurs : | Zeenath Uddin ; Debra Bick |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | Midwifery Digest (Midirs) (Vol. 30, n° 2, June 2020) |
| Article en page(s) : | p. 215-221 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Concept du soi ; Formation ; Périnée ; Pratique clinique ; Sage-femme ; Suture |
| Résumé : |
Aim : To explore and generate an understanding of the experiences of midwives undertaking birth-associated perineal trauma assessment and repair before and after completing the PEARLS (Perineal Assessment and Repair Longitudinal Study) training package, including barriers and facilitators to providing best practice in perineal care.
Design : A descriptive phenomenological study. Method : Individual semi-structured interviews were carried out with seven midwives who provided care for women during labour and birth at one London maternity unit. Transcripts of the in-depth interviews were analysed using Colaizzi's phenomenological method. Findings : Six themes emerged concerning: Personal responsibility, professional pride The real world of clinical practice Best practice not always practised Deficiency in training and learning on the job Strategies for survival An ideal world Conclusion : There were mixed views as to whether the PEARLS training improved clinical experiences and confidence in practice. Most midwives acknowledged the usefulness of the PEARLS training, however they identified that more needed to be done to improve the content of the training package as a whole. |
| Disponible en ligne : | Non |
Exemplaires (1)
| Cote | Support | Localisation | Section | Disponibilité |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Midwifery Digest (Midirs). Vol. 30, n° 2 (June 2020) | Périodique papier | Woluwe | Espace revues | Consultation sur place uniquement Exclu du prêt |
