Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Comparing statistics for objective detection of transient and steady-state evoked responses in newborns (2013) |
Auteurs : | Eleina Mijares ; María Cecilia Perez Abalo ; Didiesdle Herrera |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | International Journal of Audiology IJA (Vol.52, n°1, January 2013) |
Langues: | Anglais |
Résumé : | Objective: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology was used to compare the performance of different statistics in the automatic detection of multiple auditory steady-state responses (MSSR) and click auditory brainstem responses (cABR). Study sample: Thirty-five healthy newborns tested within the first two weeks of birth. Design: In each case cABR and MSSR (0.5 and 2 kHz) were recorded with and without acoustic stimulation, using AUDIX equipment. With this test sample of recordings, ROC curves were evaluated separately for each statistic evaluated: (1) the standard deviation ratio (SDR) and the correlation coefficient ratio (CCR) for the cABR; (2) the Hotelling T2 (HT2) and circular T2 (CT2) for the MSSR. Results: All objective detection methods performed well (areas under ROC (AUC) > 0.9). The MSSR statistics showed significantly larger AUCs at both frequencies (HT2: 0.98 and 1; CT2: 0.96 and 0.99) than the cABR measures (SDR: 0.91 and CCR: 0.92). The HT2 hits rate was the highest (97100% at 0.5 and 2 kHz) for fixed false alarms rates of both 10 and 20%. Conclusions: This superiority of performance of T2-like statistics, reflecting inherent advantages of MSSR analysis for automation, warrants serious consideration for further development of newborn screening technology. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/14992027.2012.736030 |
Exemplaires (1)
Cote | Support | Localisation | Section | Disponibilité |
---|---|---|---|---|
International journal of audiology IJA. Vol.52, n°1 (January 2013) | Périodique papier | Ixelles | Rez | Consultation sur place uniquement Exclu du prêt |