| Titre : | Measurement properties of hip strength measured by handheld dynamometry: Reliability and validity across the range of motion (2020) |
| Auteurs : | David M. Bazett-Jones ; Kaitlin Squier |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | Physical therapy in sport (Vol. 42, March 2020) |
| Article en page(s) : | p. 100-106 |
| Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.01.005 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Amplitude articulaire ; Efficacité ; Hanche |
| Mots-clés: | Dynamométrie |
| Résumé : |
Objectives
Different angles and positions may influence the reliability and validity of hip strength dynamometry. This study examined the reliability and validity of hip strength measured with belt-stabilized handheld dynamometry (HHD) compared to isokinetic dynamometry (IKD) across multiple angles. Design Repeated measures. Setting Biomechanics laboratory. Participants Thirty healthy participants completed 3 sessions. Hip torque was measured for hip abduction (ABD; −10°, 0°, 20°, and 40°), internal rotation (IR; −30°, −15°, 0°, 15°, and 30°), external rotation (ER; −30°, −15°, 0°, 15°, and 30°), and extension (EXT; −10°, 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120°). Results ABD was reliable (no intratester reliability differences p = 0.409–0.997; ICC = 0.624–0.900) and valid (no HHD-IKD difference p = 0.270–0.946; r = 0.556–0.624) measure. IR had questionable reliability (intratester reliability differences p = 0.001–0.043; ICC = 0.682–0.879) and validity (HHD-IKD differences p Conclusions HHD can be an effective tool for measuring strength under certain circumstances; however, IR/ER testing should be used with caution. |
| Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
| En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X19306030#! |
Bibliothèques HE Vinci
