Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Associations Between Insurance Provider and Assistive Technology Use for Computer and Electronic Devices 1 Year After Tetraplegia: Findings From the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems National Database (2019) |
Auteurs : | Kimberley R. Monden ; Mitch Sevigny ; Jessica M. Ketchum |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Vol. 100, n° 12, 2019) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 2260-2266 |
Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2019.06.013 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Assurance ; Dispositifs d'assistance au mouvement ; Réadaptation ; Traumatismes de la moelle épinière |
Résumé : |
Objective
To investigate the association between insurance provider and reported assistive technology (AT) use to access computers and electronic devices 1 year after sustaining tetraplegia. Design Multicenter cross-sectional study. Setting Participants enrolled in the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems (SCIMS) National Database. Interventions Not applicable. Participants Men and women with tetraplegia (N=498) enrolled in the SCIMS National Database were included in the analysis. Main Outcome Measures The primary study outcome was the use of AT when operating a computer or other mobile electronic device. The primary predictor was the subjects principal health insurance provider, which was grouped into the 3 categories: government (Medicare, Medicaid, and other government), private (private insurance, private funds, and other), and workers compensation. Results Overall, 34.7% of participants reported using AT to access computers and electronic devices. Results of logistic regression analysis revealed sex, injury level, injury completeness, self-perceived health status, and 12-month history of pressure ulcer were all significantly associated with AT use. After adjusting for these factors, participants with workers compensation were more likely to report AT use than individuals with either government or private insurance. Conclusions Despite significant technological advances, AT is not readily available to the people who might benefit most from its use. Findings from the present study are the first to shed light on AT funding sources and reveal that individuals with workers compensation are more likely use AT than individuals with either government or private insurance. Additional work focused on AT use and functional outcomes is needed to assess the effect of barriers to use. Collectively, this work may inform insurers of the importance of having AT available for this unique population to potentially improve quality of life and participation. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999319304575 |