| Titre : | No difference in pressure pain threshold and temporal summation after lumbar spinal manipulation compared to sham: A randomised controlled trial in adults with low back pain (2019) |
| Auteurs : | Sasha L. Aspinall ; Angela Jacques ; Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde ; Sarah Jane Etherington ; Bruce F. Walker |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | Musculoskeletal Science and Practice (Vol. 43, October 2019) |
| Article en page(s) : | p. 18-25 |
| Note générale : | doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2019.05.011 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Lombalgie ; Manipulations de l'appareil locomoteur |
| Mots-clés: | hypoalgésie |
| Résumé : |
Background : Changes in quantitative sensory tests have been observed after spinal manipulative therapy (SMT), particularly in pressure pain thresholds (PPT) and temporal summation (TS). However, a recent systematic review comparing SMT to sham found no significant difference in PPT in patients with musculoskeletal pain. The sham-controlled studies were generally low quality, and conclusions about other quantitative sensory tests could not be made.
Objectives : We aimed to perform a sham-controlled study with the specific objective of investigating changes in PPT and TS short-term after lumbar SMT compared to sham manipulation in people with low back pain. |
| Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
| En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781219300670 |
Bibliothèques HE Vinci
