| Titre : | Do Neglect Assessments Detect Neglect Differently? (2017) |
| Auteurs : | Emily S. Grattan, Auteur ; Michelle Woodbury, Auteur |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | American journal of occupational therapy (Vol. 71, n° 3, May/June 2017) |
| Article en page(s) : | pp.1-9 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Accident vasculaire cérébral (AVC) ; Diagnostic ; Evaluation |
| Résumé : | OBJECTIVE. We determined whether various assessment tools detect neglect differently by administering a battery of assessments to people with stroke. METHOD. We conducted a case series study and administered five neglect assessments (paper-and-pencil, functional, virtual reality) to participants poststroke. RESULTS. Twelve participants (6 men, 6 women) with stroke completed the assessment battery, which required approximately 2 hr to administer (over one to two sessions). All participants demonstrated neglect on three or more assessments. Functional assessments and the virtual reality assessment detected neglect more frequently than the paper-and-pencil assessments. Participants performed differently on the paper-and- pencil assessments and functional assessments. CONCLUSION. Because neglect is complex, detection may depend largely on the assessment administered. |
| Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
| En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=122432462&site=ehost-live |
Bibliothèques HE Vinci
