Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | The interrater and intrarater reliability of the functional movement screen : A systematic review with meta-analysis (2016) |
Auteurs : | Jennifer W. Cuchna ; Matthew C. Hoch ; Johanna M. Hoch |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Physical therapy in sport (2016/3, May 2016) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 57-65 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Résumé : |
Objective To synthesize the literature and perform a meta-analysis for both the interrater and intrarater reliability of the FMS. Methods Academic Search Complete, CINAHL, Medline and SportsDiscus databases were systematically searched from inception to March 2015. Studies were included if the primary purpose was to determine the interrater or intrarater reliability of the FMS, assessed and scored all 7-items using the standard scoring criteria, provided a composite score and employed intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Studies were excluded if reliability was not the primary aim, participants were injured at data collection, or a modified FMS or scoring system was utilized. Results Seven papers were included; 6 assessing interrater and 6 assessing intrarater reliability. There was moderate evidence in good interrater reliability with a summary ICC of 0.843 (95% CI = 0.640, 0.936; Q7 = 84.915, p Conclusion There was moderate evidence for both forms of reliability. The sensitivity assessments revealed this interpretation is stable and not influenced by any one study. Overall, the FMS is a reliable tool for clinical practice. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X1500139X |