| Titre : | Differences in clinician-oriented outcomes among controls, copers, and chronic ankle instability groups (2013) |
| Auteurs : | Jessica E. Plante, Auteur ; Erik A. Wikstrom, Auteur |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | Physical therapy in sport (2013/4, 2013) |
| Article en page(s) : | pp.221-226 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Équilibre postural |
| Mots-clés: | Traumatismes de la cheville |
| Résumé : |
Objective
To compare clinician-oriented outcome measures among uninjured controls, copers, and chronic ankle instability (CAI) groups. Design Case-control study. Setting Research Laboratory. Participants Participants were 25 active adults with unilateral CAI ([mean + SD] age: 23.7 + 4.9 years), 21 copers ([mean + SD] age: 23.2 + 4.7 years), and 20 uninjured controls ([mean + SD] age: 21.1 + 2.5 years). Main outcome measures Range of motion and posterior talar glide were assessed via a weight-bearing lunge and a talar glide test, respectively. Cutaneous sensation was measured during a Semmes–Weinstein Monofilament test. Dynamic balance was measured during the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT). Muscular strength was assessed during manual muscle tests of the dorsiflexors, plantar flexors, invertors, and evertors. Results The CAI group had decreased dorsiflexion range of motion relative to controls (p = 0.02). Those with CAI also had decreased balance during the posterior-medial reach of the SEBT compared to copers and controls (p Conclusions Some clinician-oriented outcomes, but not all, can detect differences among uninjured controls, copers, and those with CAI. |
| Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
| En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X12001101 |
Bibliothèques HE Vinci
