| Titre : | Building a Rehabilitative Care Measurement Instrument to Improve the Patient Experience (2019) |
| Auteurs : | Josephine McMurray ; Heather McNeil ; Alicia Gordon |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Vol. 100, n° 1, 2019) |
| Article en page(s) : | p. 39-44 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Enquêtes sur les soins de santé ; Mesures des résultats rapportés par les patients (PROM) ; Rééducation et réadaptation |
| Mots-clés: | Health care evaluation mechanisms ; Mécanismes d'évaluation des soins de santé ; Health care surveys ; Patient reported outcome measures |
| Résumé : |
Objective To develop and test face and content validity, and user interface design of a rehabilitative care patient experience measure. Design Mixed methods, cross-sectional validation study that included subject matter expert input. Cognitive interviewing tested user interface and design. Setting Outpatient rehabilitative care settings. Participants Subject matter experts (n=3), health care providers (n=137), and patients and caregivers (n=5) contributed to the question development. Convenience and snowball sampling were used to recruit rehabilitative care patients postdischarge (n=9) for cognitive interviews to optimize survey design and user interface (N=154). Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure This novel survey instrument measures 6 concepts previously identified as key to outpatient rehabilitative care patients’ experience: ecosystem issues, client and informal caregiver engagement, patient and health care provider relations, pain and functional status, group and individual identity, and open-ended feedback. Results 502 survey questions from psychometrically tested instruments, secondary data from a related ethnographic study, and consultations with health care providers, patients, caregivers, and subject matter experts, were analyzed to create a 10-item questionnaire representing 6 key constructs that influence patient experience quality. Cognitive interviewing with 9 patients (3 rounds of 3 participants each), produced 3 progressively edited versions of the survey instrument. A final version required no further modifications. Discussion Rehabilitative care clients have characteristics that differentiate their experience from that of other sectors and patient groups, warranting a distinct experience measure. The survey instrument includes a parsimonious set of questions that address strategic issues in the ongoing improvement of care delivery and the patient experience in the rehabilitative care sector. Conclusion The rehabilitative care patient experience survey instrument developed has an acceptable user interface, and content and face validity. Psychometric testing of the survey instrument is reported elsewhere. |
| Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
| En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999318303812 |
Bibliothèques HE Vinci
