Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Psychological Resources, Appraisals, and Coping and Their Relationship to Participation in Spinal Cord Injury: A Path Analysis (2014) |
Auteurs : | Claudio Peter ; Rachel Müller ; Marcel W. Post |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (2014/9, 2014) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 1662-1671 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Adaptation ; Adaptation psychologique ; Participation sociale ; Rééducation et réadaptation ; Traumatismes de la moelle épinière |
Mots-clés: | psychological ; Models ; structural ; Maquettes de structure ; Self efficacy ; Auto-efficacité ; Social participation ; Spinal cord injuries |
Résumé : |
Objective To test the Spinal Cord Injury Adjustment Model and gain a better understanding about whether and how the psychological resources general self-efficacy (SE), purpose in life (PIL), appraisals, and coping influence participation in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). Design Cross-sectional data collection within the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort. Setting Community setting. Participants Persons with SCI (N=516) who are ≥16 years old and living in the community in Switzerland. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Participation was measured with the restrictions subscale of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation, General SE with the General Self-Efficacy Scale, PIL with the Purpose in Life Test-Short Form, appraisals with the Appraisal of Life Events Scale, and coping with the Brief COPE. Results General SE (r=.32) and PIL (r=.23) were associated with less participation restrictions. The initial model yielded a poor model fit. The modified final model had an acceptable fit (χ211=36.2; P<.01 root mean square error of approximation=".067" confidence interval: .045 comparative fit index=".98)." a total the variance participation was explained. in final model general se had moderate direct effect and mediated effects via threat appraisal challenge humor on indicating partial mediation effect. association between pil indirect: acted as mediators.> Conclusions The results only partly support the double-mediating effect as suggested in the SCI adjustment model because both direct and indirect effects on participation were observed. Individuals with higher general SE and PIL perceive less participation restrictions. General SE seems an appropriate target to enhance participation. Longitudinal studies are needed to support our findings. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999314003281 |