| Titre : | Leveraging the Medical Context to Increase Upper Extremity Reconstruction Among Patients With Tetraplegia: A Qualitative Analysis (2018) |
| Auteurs : | Chelsea A. Harris ; John-Michael Muller ; Melissa J. Shauver |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Vol. 99, n° 3, 2018) |
| Article en page(s) : | p. 459-467 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Rééducation et réadaptation ; Tétraplégie ; Traumatismes de la moelle épinière |
| Mots-clés: | Quadriplegia ; Spinal cord injuries ; Tendon transfer ; Transposition tendineuse |
| Résumé : |
Objectives To (1) characterize patients' medical experiences from initial injury until they become candidates for upper extremity reconstruction (UER); and (2) identify points in this medical context that may be most amenable to interventions designed to increase UER utilization. Design A qualitative cross-sectional study using grounded theory methodology and constant comparative analysis of data collected through semistructured individual interviews. Setting Community. Participants A sample of individuals with C4 to C8 cervical spinal injuries (N=19) who sustained injuries at least 1 year before interview. Nine patients had undergone reconstruction, and 10 had not. The study sample was predominantly male (79%) and white (89%), and American Spinal Injury Association grades A through D were represented (A, 42%; B, 32%; C, 16%; D, 10%). Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Participants' self-report of their medical experiences from the time of injury through the early recovery period. Results We identified 3 domains that formed patients' medical context before UER candidacy: (1) their ability to achieve and maintain health; (2) their relationship with health care providers; and (3) their expectations regarding clinicians' tetraplegia-specific expertise. Trust emerged as a major theme driving potential intervention targets. Patients transferred to referral centers had higher trust in tertiary providers relative to local physicians. In the outpatient setting, patients' trust correlated with the tetraplegia-specific expertise level they perceived the specialty to have (high for physical medicine and rehabilitation, intermediate for urology, low for primary care). Conclusions In appropriate candidates, UER produces substantial functional gains, but reconstruction remains underused in the tetraplegic population. By analyzing how patients achieve health and build trust in early recovery/injury, our study provides strategies to improve UER access. We propose that interventions targeting highly trusted points of care (transfer hospitals) and avoiding low-trust points (primary care physicians, home health) will be most effective. Urology may represent a novel entry point for UER interventions. |
| Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
| En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999317305245 |
Bibliothèques HE Vinci
