| Titre : | Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Improves Hemispatial Neglect After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2018) |
| Auteurs : | Ana Paula S. Salazar ; Patricia G. Vaz ; Ritchele R. Marchese |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Vol. 99, n° 2, 2018) |
| Article en page(s) : | p. 355-366 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Rééducation et réadaptation ; Stimulation magnétique transcranienne ; Stimulation transcrânienne par courant continu |
| Mots-clés: | Neurological rehabilitation ; Rééducation neurologique ; Physical therapy modalities ; Techniques de physiothérapie ; Transcranial direct current stimulation ; Transcranial magnetic stimulation |
| Résumé : |
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS)—repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)—on hemispatial neglect and performance in activities of daily living (ADL) after stroke. Data Sources MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, SciELO, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database were searched from database inception to December 2016. Data Selection Randomized controlled trials or crossover trials focused on determining the effects of tDCS or rTMS combined or not combined with other therapies for hemispatial neglect after stroke. Data Extraction Methodological characteristics of the studies, number of participants, comparison groups, interventions, and outcomes were extracted. Data Synthesis Ten trials comprising 226 participants had data that were suitable for the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis showed that NIBS combined with other therapies significantly improves hemispatial neglect (standardized mean difference [SMD]=–1.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], –2.57 to –1.25; I2=71%). A sensitivity analysis showed that rTMS (SMD=–2.16; 95% CI, –3.00 to –1.33; I2=76%) and tDCS (SMD=–1.07; 95% CI, –1.76 to –0.37; I2=0%) had positive effects on hemispatial neglect. Furthermore, both excitatory (SMD=–2.34; 95% CI, –3.56 to –1.12; I2=65%) and inhibitory (SMD=–1.69; 95% CI, –2.49 to –0.88; I2=75%) stimulations were effective. Conclusions This meta-analysis reveals moderate-quality evidence for the effectiveness of NIBS protocols combined with other therapies on hemispatial neglect and performance in ADL after stroke. |
| Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
| En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999317305312 |
Bibliothèques HE Vinci
