| Titre : | Effects of Varying Case Definition on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Prevalence Estimates in a Pooled Cohort (2014) |
| Auteurs : | Matthew S. Thiese ; Fred Gerr ; Kurt Hegmann |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (2014/12, 2014) |
| Article en page(s) : | p. 2320-2326 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Prévalence ; Rééducation et réadaptation ; Syndrome du canal carpien |
| Mots-clés: | Carpal tunnel syndrome ; Diagnostic techniques and procedures ; Techniques et procédures diagnostiques ; Electrodiagnosis ; Électrodiagnostic ; Reference Standards ; Normes de référence |
| Résumé : |
Objective To analyze differences in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) prevalence using a combination of electrodiagnostic studies (EDSs) and symptoms using EDS criteria varied across a range of cutpoints and compared with symptoms in both ≥1 and ≥2 median nerve–served digits. Design Pooled data from 5 prospective cohorts. Setting Hand-intensive industrial settings, including manufacturing, assembly, production, service, construction, and health care. Participants Employed, working-age participants who are able to provide consent and undergo EDS testing (N=3130). Interventions None. Main Outcome Measures CTS prevalence was estimated while varying the thresholds for median sensory latency, median motor latency, and transcarpal delta latency difference. EDS criteria examined included the following: median sensory latency of 3.3 to 4.1 milliseconds, median motor latency of 4.1 to 4.9 milliseconds, and median-ulnar sensory difference of 0.4 to 1.2 milliseconds. EDS criteria were combined with symptoms in ≥1 or ≥2 median nerve–served digits. EDS criteria from other published studies were applied to allow for comparison. Results CTS prevalence ranged from 6.3% to 11.7%. CTS prevalence estimates changed most per millisecond of sensory latency compared with motor latency or transcarpal delta. CTS prevalence decreased by 0.9% to 2.0% if the criteria required symptoms in 2 digits instead of 1. Conclusions There are meaningful differences in CTS prevalence when different EDS criteria are applied. The digital sensory latency criteria result in the largest variance in prevalence. |
| Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
| En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999314010016 |
Bibliothèques HE Vinci
