| Titre : | Classical Test Theory and Rasch Analysis Validation of the Upper Limb Functional Index in Subjects With Upper Limb Musculoskeletal Disorders (2015) |
| Auteurs : | Elisabetta Bravini ; Franco Franchignoni ; Andrea Giordano |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (2015/1, 2015) |
| Article en page(s) : | p. 98-104 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Évaluation de résultat (soins) ; Maladies ostéomusculaires ; Psychométrie ; Rééducation et réadaptation |
| Mots-clés: | Disability evaluation ; Évaluation de l'incapacité ; Musculoskeletal Diseases ; Outcome assessment (health care) ; Psychometrics |
| Résumé : |
Objective To perform a comprehensive analysis of the psychometric properties and dimensionality of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) using both classical test theory and Rasch analysis (RA). Design Prospective, single-group observational design. Setting Freestanding rehabilitation center. Participants Convenience sample of Italian-speaking subjects with upper limb musculoskeletal disorders (N=174). Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures The Italian version of the ULFI. Data were analyzed using parallel analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and RA for evaluating dimensionality, functioning of rating scale categories, item fit, hierarchy of item difficulties, and reliability indices. Results Parallel analysis revealed 2 factors explaining 32.5% and 10.7% of the response variance. RA confirmed the failure of the unidimensionality assumption, and 6 items out of the 25 misfitted the Rasch model. When the analysis was rerun excluding the misfitting items, the scale showed acceptable fit values, loading meaningfully to a single factor. Item separation reliability and person separation reliability were .98 and .89, respectively. Cronbach alpha was .92. Conclusions RA revealed weakness of the scale concerning dimensionality and internal construct validity. However, a set of 19 ULFI items defined through the statistical process demonstrated a unidimensional structure, good psychometric properties, and clinical meaningfulness. These findings represent a useful starting point for further analyses of the tool (based on modern psychometric approaches and confirmatory factor analysis) in larger samples, including different patient populations and nationalities. |
| Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
| En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999314010624 |
Bibliothèques HE Vinci
