Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Toning It Down: Selecting Outcome Measures for Spasticity Management Using a Modified Delphi Approach (2015) |
Auteurs : | Shelialah Pereira ; Marina Richardson ; Swati Mehta |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (2015/3, 2015) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 518-523 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Consensus ; Évaluation de résultat (soins) ; Rééducation et réadaptation |
Mots-clés: | Muscle spasticity ; Spasticité musculaire ; Outcome assessment (health care) |
Résumé : |
Objective To identify a set of clinically useful outcome measures for assessment of adults receiving treatment for spasticity. Design A modified Delphi process was conducted. In round 1, key areas of spasticity assessment and associated outcome measures were identified. In round 2, participants were presented with reviews of eligible outcome measures and were asked to select the tool they believed to be the best in each area. Consensus was achieved if there was at least 70% agreement among participants. In round 3, participants rated measures based on feasibility, ability to capture change, and usefulness of information gained for areas where consensus was not achieved in round 2. Setting The Modified Delphi process was conducted online using survey software. Participants Clinicians (N=32) from centers across Canada participated in this study. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Not applicable. Results Of 51 tools identified initially, 8 were selected. Tools related to body structure and function included the visual analog scale, manual muscle testing, Penn Spasm Frequency Scale, and goniometry. Activity level measures included the Berg Balance Scale, Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS), and the FIM. The Modified Caregiver Strain Index was selected for the assessment of caregiver burden, while GAS was selected for participation level outcomes. Conclusions A standardized set of outcome measures will assist with better documentation and standardization of assessment practices of clinicians who manage spasticity. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999314011563 |