Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Psychometric Properties of the Spinal Cord Injury Pressure Ulcer Scale (SCIPUS) for Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment During Inpatient Rehabilitation (2015) |
Auteurs : | Jude J. Delparte ; Carol Y. Scovil ; Heather M. Flett |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (2015/11, 2015) |
Article en page(s) : | pp. 19801985 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Escarre ; Evaluation des risques ; Rééducation et réadaptation ; Sensibilité et spécificité ; Traumatismes de la moelle épinière |
Mots-clés: | Pressure ulcer ; Reproducibility of results ; Reproductibilité des résultats ; Risk assessment ; Sensitivity and specificity ; Spinal cord injuries |
Résumé : |
Objective To assess the psychometric properties of the Spinal Cord Injury Pressure Ulcer Scale (SCIPUS) for pressure ulcer (PU) risk assessment during inpatient rehabilitation. Design Prospective cohort. Setting Tertiary rehabilitation centers. Participants Individuals (N=759) participating in inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation between January 3, 2012, and April 23, 2014. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Admission SCIPUS scores and the corresponding risk stratification, PU incidence, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for interrater reliability, sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios (LRs). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to calculate the area under the curve (AUC). Results Mean SCIPUS scores were higher for individuals who developed PUs than for those who did not (mean SCIPUS score, 9.8+2.5 vs 8.5+2.6). Interrater reliability was excellent for SCIPUS composite scores (ICC=.91) and very good for risk stratification (ICC=.86). Using the existing cutoff value of ≥6 for high risk category, sensitivity and specificity were estimated to be .97 and .12, respectively, with an LR of 1.1. A cutoff value of ≥8 yielded a better balance between sensitivity and specificity (.85 and .38, respectively). The AUC equaled .64 with an LR of 1.4. Results were similar when the analysis was confined to PUs of stage II or greater. Conclusions The psychometric properties of the SCIPUS do not currently support its routine use as a measure of PU risk in individuals with spinal cord injury undergoing inpatient rehabilitation. LRs of |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999315005638 |