| Titre : | Measuring Participation of Rehabilitation Patients: Test-Retest Reliability and Mode of Administration Concordance of the Participation Measure–3 Domains, 4 Dimensions (PM-3D4D) (2017) |
| Auteurs : | Feng-Hang Chang |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (2017/8, 2017) |
| Article en page(s) : | pp. 1622–1627 |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Participation sociale ; Psychométrie ; Rééducation et réadaptation |
| Mots-clés: | International Classification of Functioning ; Disability and Health ; Classification internationale du fonctionnement ; du handicap et de la santé ; Patient outcome assessment ; Évaluation des résultats des patients ; Psychometrics ; Social participation |
| Résumé : |
Objective To evaluate the test-retest reliability and the concordance between the interviewer-administered version and the self-administered version of a newly developed participation measure, Participation Measure–3 Domains, 4 Dimensions (PM-3D4D). Design Multicenter observational study. Setting Outpatient rehabilitation programs. Participants Rehabilitation outpatients (N=262) participated in the study, including those (n=202) who participated in the test-retest study and those (n=60) who participated in the 2 modes of the administration study. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures The PM-3D4D includes 19 items measuring participation in productivity, social, and community domains across 4 dimensions: diversity of participation, frequency of participation, desire for change, and difficulty in participation. Results The test-retest reliability was good across domains and dimensions (intraclass correlation coefficients, .76–.96) as well as in neurological and nonneurological groups. The test-retest reliability was also mostly good at the item level. A high concordance was found between the 2 administration modes (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.96–1.00). Conclusions The study results lend support to the use of the PM-3D4D to reliably assess participation of rehabilitation patients. The high concordance between the 2 administration modes suggests the potential use of the instrument in population-based research. |
| Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
| En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999317301806 |
Bibliothèques HE Vinci
