Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Perspectives on Postural Control Dysfunction to Inform Future Research: A Delphi Study for Children With Cerebral Palsy (2017) |
Auteurs : | Rosalee Dewar ; Andrew P. Claus ; Kylie Tucker |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (2017/3, 2017) |
Article en page(s) : | pp. 463-479 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Paralysie cérébrale |
Mots-clés: | Cerebral palsy ; Delphi technique ; Méthode Delphi ; Postural balance ; Équilibre postural |
Résumé : |
Objective To identify whether consensus can be achieved in how clinicians and researchers define, describe, assess, and treat postural control dysfunction in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Design Delphi study with 3 iterative rounds. Setting Electronic survey. Participants Researchers and/or clinicians (N=43) from 7 countries with a mean + SD of 20+11 years of experience working with children with CP participated. Participants included authors of published works on postural control in CP (identified from a recent systematic review), members of the Australasian Academy of CP and Developmental Medicine, and 2 major Australian rehabilitation providers. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures The Delphi study consisted of 3 iterative rounds of surveys. In Round 1, respondents answered open-ended questions regarding their views on (1) definition items for postural control, (2) theoretical frameworks, (3) methods for assessment, and (4) interventions for postural control dysfunction in children with CP. Rounds 2 and 3 were made up of items generated by participants in Round 1 and combined with items identified from the literature. Participants indicated their level of agreement for each item on a 7-point Likert scale. Threshold for consensus was ≥85% agreement. Results Of 306 items generated, 174 reached consensus by Round 3. Most postural control definition items (90%) achieved consensus. Two theoretical frameworks (14%) reached consensus. Less than half (42%) of assessment items reached consensus. More individual assessment items (89%) reached consensus than multi-item tools (4%). Just over half (61%) of the items generated for interventions reached consensus. Conclusion Consensus was achieved for a postural control definition. However, substantial research is needed to establish a comprehensive, postural controlspecific framework and suite of assessments. These would provide a foundation to improve intervention selection and dosage. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999316308978 |