Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Systematic Review of the Clinimetric Properties of Laboratory- and Field-Based Aerobic and Anaerobic Fitness Measures in Children With Cerebral Palsy (2013) |
Auteurs : | Astrid Balemans ; Maria Fragala Pinkham ; Nancy Lennon ; et al. |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (2013/2, 2013) |
Article en page(s) : | pp. 287-301 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Epreuve d'effort ; Exercice physique ; Paralysie cérébrale ; Psychométrie ; Rééducation et réadaptation |
Mots-clés: | Exercise ; Cerebral palsy ; Exercise test ; Psychometrics ; Reproducibility of Results ; Reproductibilité des résultats |
Résumé : |
Objective To systematically evaluate the level of evidence of the clinimetric properties of measures of aerobic and anaerobic capacity used for children with cerebral palsy (CP). Data Sources A systematic search of databases PubMed, Embase, SPORTDiscus, and PsycINFO through April 2011 was performed. Study Selection Two independent raters identified and examined studies that reported laboratory- or field-based measures of maximal aerobic or anaerobic capacity in children with CP aged 5 to 14 years. Data Extraction The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist was used by 2 independent raters to evaluate the methodologic quality of the included clinimetric studies and to identify measures used in these studies. Data Synthesis Twenty-four studies that used a maximal aerobic or anaerobic capacity measure were identified. Five studies reported clinimetric properties for 5 measures (2 aerobic and 3 anaerobic measures). Methodologic quality was excellent in 3 studies, showing good validity and reliability of field-based aerobic (Shuttle Run Test) and anaerobic (Muscle Power Sprint Test) measures. The studies on laboratory-based measures were rated fair, mainly because of inadequate statistics. The level of evidence was strong for good validity and reliability of the field-based tests. The level of evidence was unknown for validity and low to moderate for good reliability of laboratory-based tests. Conclusions There is a paucity of research on the clinimetric properties of measurement instruments to assess aerobic and anaerobic capacity for children with CP. Further clinimetric studies of laboratory-based measures in children with CP at all Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels, and clinimetric studies of field-based measures in children who are classified as GMFCS levels III to V are required. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | http://www.archives-pmr.org/article/S0003-9993%2812%2900932-X/abstract |